2-Minute Tuesday Let's CFI faster Issue 38
Instructional Aids & Training Technologies FI.I.C.K7
Why This Matters
A great explanation, unsupported, still leaves gaps. Some things are faster to show than to say, and some relationships only click when a student can see them. Instructional aids close that gap. Used well, they measurably improve retention. Used poorly, they're a distraction.
What Makes One Effective
Good instructional aids share three traits:
Cover the key points: Not everything, just what matters
Straightforward and factual: Easy to remember and recall
Simple: Relatively simple aids consistently outperform elaborate ones
Why Use Instructional Aids?

Guidelines for Use
Plan it - Four steps:
Establish the lesson objective. Know exactly what you're communicating.
Gather the data. Research your support material.
Organize it into a lesson plan, including key points and any safety considerations.
Select what needs an aid. Concentrate on the key points. Reach for an aid when something is long and technical, hard to describe, or where you notice yourself forming a mental picture the words aren't capturing.
Execute it well:
Keep it simple and matched to the material. Complex equipment may need a detailed schematic; simple equipment needs only a basic shape
Minimize words. The aid supports your verbal presentation. It isn't a script
Don't lean on it as a crutch, and avoid distracting artwork
Test it in the actual environment. Volume, visibility from the back of the room, contrast. An aid nobody can see or hear has no value
Draft, then check. For instructor-made aids, build a rough draft and review it for accuracy, terminology, spelling, and clarity before using it
A quick gut-check: does it support the objective, stay learner-centered, build on what they already know, and use terminology they'll understand? If yes, you're on track. That's most of what the AIH's own checklist for aids comes down to.
Types
Marker board: Reusable, and good for joint instructor-learner work
Print material: Photos, charts, diagrams; cheap, durable, good for long-term display
Enhanced training materials: Syllabi and maneuvers guides built with endorsements, recordkeeping, and the ACS baked in
Projected material and video: Plan it, preview it, don't let it replace you. Summarize and take questions after
Interactive/CAL systems: Branching, responsive software; the instructor shifts to facilitator but still owns the learning objectives
Models, mock-ups, and cut-aways: Physical stand-ins for equipment that's too costly, too dangerous, or impossible to bring into the room
What This Looks Like
You're teaching the fuel system on a complex, multi-tank aircraft.
Objective: The student understands fuel flow and tank management well enough to catch an imbalance before it's a problem.
Data: You pull the POH's fuel system diagram and your own notes on common mismanagement errors.
Lesson plan: Fuel flow first, then tank switching procedures, then the failure scenarios.
Aid selection: This is exactly the case for a diagram: a system with multiple interacting parts, hard to describe in words alone, and you notice yourself gesturing to explain it. You sketch it on the marker board, building it live so students see the relationships form.
Execution: Simple labels, no clutter, and you check that the sketch stays legible for the students in the back row.
Checkride Q&A
DPE Might Ask
"You're preparing to teach a complex system. How do you decide what instructional aids to use, and how do you plan for them?”
Weak Answer
"I'd probably use some diagrams or a video, whatever helps make it clearer. I'd just build the aids based on what I think will keep the students interested."
Why this fails
No planning process. The aids come first, driven by guesswork about what's "interesting," rather than from a clearly established objective. There's no mention of the four-step process or any criteria for when an aid is actually warranted.
Strong Answer
"I'd start with the objective: exactly what I need the student to understand. Then I'd gather the supporting data and organize it into the lesson plan, including any safety considerations. From there I'd decide where an aid actually earns its place: long technical explanations, complex relationships that are hard to put into words, or anywhere I notice myself forming a mental picture the words aren't capturing. For a fuel system, that's a diagram, because the relationships between tanks and flow are much clearer shown than described. I'd keep it simple, test it for visibility, and make sure it supports the objective rather than becoming a crutch or a distraction."
The mock checkride on backseatpilot.app asks questions like this across every element in Task I.C.
Nate is a CFI, CFII, and MEI, former USAF C-17 Instructor Pilot, and current airline pilot with 8,500+ flight hours. He writes 2-Minute Tuesday to make CFI checkride prep clearer, simpler, and more logical, one ACS element at a time.
Get 2-Minute Tuesday by email
One CFI ACS element every Tuesday. In your inbox a week before it's posted here.
You're in. Look for it Tuesday.
Unsubscribe anytime.Study the full Task I.C lessons
AI-integrated slides, audio, quizzes, teach-back and oral questioning for every section — then a mock checkride on the whole task.